wrote:

what u gain from that? u even ask? u ban someone that "maybe" wasn't cheating and u ask what u gain?

Excuse me, I did ban noone.

You obviously didn't understand yet, I am no longer part of the community, I do not have to contribute, nevertheless I did contribute no matter what the result of the roxor discussion is. And for my face, there is nothing more annoying then to be spammed by tons of people I don't even care about, is that what the community contributes to me? To be more exact, its a group effect you also can see on sites like facebook, since everyone is basically friendly they expect you to be friendly too. Nevertheless this isn't the purpose of my gaming.

wrote:

asking what u gain for give some proofs after u ban someone without explanation/proof that maybe wasn't even cheating? u serious boy? i think u should think a bit more before write...im still here waiting an answer

A: I didn't ban noone.
B: Its up to admins to decide, whose are influenced by the community.
C: as part of the community you should get your own opinion.

Join a experiment, imagine you know roxor only plays since 2 months, would you believe that straight? Or would you build your own opinion about him and his gamestyle. No matter what I say, you should be capable of making urself an opinion, if you believe he does not cheat then were is your problem? For the rank mods to take action the community has to influence them, ergo first the community needs to have serious doubts about him and then the rank mods move. Until that moment roxor basically hasn't to defend himself.

says the guy who cant even proof i cheat even if its obvious to him and he cant describe the obvious.

wrote:

I described it many times that you don't use wh, you simple use triggerable custom hax autoshoot and bypassing the anticheat

And that is the reason I can acc nearly 60 on a war with smaller hitboxes?!

wrote:

but ofc you not so stupid to use it always ( only to show 70 - 86 acc games from time to time ) to show all that you teh master

Excuse me, but you didn't understand the essence of my gaming, I game for power, for the challenge, not for the accuracy, those just happen to me from time to time

wrote:

even if you lose with your real skill against guys like roxor, narcyz and so on in real...

I didn't play serius vs roxor, if you would have seen demo you would have recognised that i fragged him more then he me, I just dropped down 2-3 times due to failmove.

wrote:

or only can make real 53 acc (like nosia, zarzyn, billyJ, exotic, mr doc and so on) that you showed me on era dm17 instead of 86 acc that you should have shown to prove things...

2 things:
A: all people you mentioned cant keep an accuracy of 44-53 over 3 games, everyone of them would fail in the second or third game to acc so high.
B: I never did an acc of 86 on era, therefor you can't compare it, you even said so yourself on our teamviewer conversation.

killer you talk a lot of about nosia and his 53 acc. he dont show nothing special because the most important in era is time of game not acc. my stats from 300 games is 44 acc. http://www.thepopeuk.co.uk/elitez_era_dm17/pub/themes/bismarck/playerstat.php?playerID=D3A1FEA0C6702E7D78F86A0BE20CB966&config=cfg-default.php not from 1 game . ok. but from many games. skull show screen from 4 minuts when he shot 29 times. in era he must hit 200 time. and you say that he must score 86 acc in era. to show you that he is clean. it is stupid thinking.

wrote:

wrote:

Demo was taken at the beggining of the year 04.01.2011
name: TGK

You are reporting this way to late :F

mean anything?