NVIDIA vs ATI performance test

69 replies [Last post]
K1LLER|GAME|PLAYER
BMF.Killer's picture
Offline
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts:
NVIDIA vs ATI performance test

if you want only single card and money doesn't matter buy :

ati radeon hd 4870 / 4850

or

geforce gtx 295 / 280 / 260

i have ati radeon hd 4850 ( its damn fast enough, burnout paradise runs with 70 fps in best graphic settings and in burnout 70fps looks very fast ) .

.
K1LLER say's, i just kicked ya ass!

Jay
Offline
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts:
GB United Kingdom
NVIDIA vs ATI performance test

q3.132
anisotropic 16x anti aliasing 16xQ 2.4 seconds 527fps
anisotropic 16x anti aliasing 8 2.4 seconds 529fps
gfx-gtx280
cpu- icq 4x3.6
4gb ddr2 800
vista ultimate x64

K1LLER|GAME|PLAYER
BMF.Killer's picture
Offline
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts:
NVIDIA vs ATI performance test
fala'fag wrote:


AM2 1x2.2GHz

cpu is the prob, i have ati 4850 too but with dualcore 2.8 ghz x2 @ OC, i can have stable 333 fps without any probs.

.
K1LLER say's, i just kicked ya ass!

rUnThEoN?!
Site administrator
Skullheadq3's picture
Offline
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts:
DE Germany
NVIDIA vs ATI performance test

how many background processes u guys run in the background? because turning 4-5 off can gain me +50 fps.

hurrenson: "This idiot is apparently not familiar with a rail/sniper style."

..ZMB..EPYKOI
epykoi's picture
Offline
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts:
NVIDIA vs ATI performance test

I have Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 @ 2.4GHz + Ati Radeon HD4870 512GB + 2*1GB DDRII

And I can play Crysis etc..
But if you chose the 1GB version you'll get a bit more fps.

Anyway, to play Quake you don't need such hardware xD

Gonna post my fps soon Winking Winking

But.. does it really matter to have loads of fps on quake ? I don't think so.. plus does not really matter if you have a good screen.
Also, most of server only allow you to have 125fps max.. Worried

But if you want good benchmarks -> http://canardpc.com/dossier-50-900-comparatif___conclusion.html

(it's in french sorry but number are readable right ? Tongue )



mow Q [EN]
Offline
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts:
Re: NVIDIA vs ATI performance test

specs for: || cpu : Q6600 4x2.4GHz || ram : 3GB || gfx : Geforce 8800 Ultra||

quake3 -> Vista Ultimate SP2 32 bit -> 564,8 fps

Used:
16 x AF
4 x AA

..ZMB..EPYKOI wrote:


Anyway, to play Quake you don't need such hardware xD

You don't need uber-hardwre to reach 333 fps, but a bit better hardware anyway, if u wanna play high details.

..ZMB..EPYKOI wrote:


But.. does it really matter to have loads of fps on quake ?

Yes it does matter, especially in PR 1.16n Mod noGhost. 333 fps brings u bigger advantages in 1.16n

..ZMB..EPYKOI wrote:


But if you want good benchmarks -> http://canardpc.com/dossier-50-900-comparatif___conclusion.html

not relevant for falas question

joey
Offline
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts:
NVIDIA vs ATI performance test
rUnThEoN?! wrote:

how many background processes u guys run in the background? because turning 4-5 off can gain me +50 fps.

too many + plus vista

*ZMB*ORBY*
Offline
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts:
NVIDIA vs ATI performance test

hi.

edited for screenshot:
i have only q3: Win Xp sp2 x64 edition ->2.2s - 582fps

with AF 16x - AA Skull

gfx 3dClub 8800GTS | cpu Q9450 | 4gb geil @ 1066

i'll post the results with Sabayon Linux 4.1 soon.

K1LLER|GAME|PLAYER
BMF.Killer's picture
Offline
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts:
NVIDIA vs ATI performance test

quake 3 is made for singlecore cpu , bc 1999 there was no dualcore or quad, there is some cfg command that should be able to make dualcore support possible for quake3 , but tested it , doesnt work !

and for example a dualcore with 2.8 ghz at one core is faster in q3 as a quadcore with 2.4 ghz , bc quake 3 only use one core, but anyway to be future ready you should buy a multicore cpu .

.
K1LLER say's, i just kicked ya ass!

rUnThEoN?!
Site administrator
Skullheadq3's picture
Offline
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts:
DE Germany
NVIDIA vs ATI performance test
K1LLER|GAME|PLAYER wrote:

quake 3 is made for singlecore cpu , bc 1999 there was no dualcore or quad, there is some cfg command that should be able to make dualcore support possible for quake3 , but tested it , doesnt work !

r_smp 1 enables support for 2 cpus, not dualcore nub.

hurrenson: "This idiot is apparently not familiar with a rail/sniper style."