NVIDIA vs ATI performance test

69 replies [Last post]
20. June 2009 - 21:44
#21
K1LLER|GAME|PLAYER
BMF.Killer's picture
Offline
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts:
NVIDIA vs ATI performance test

@ SKULL

quake 3 page:

Dualcore¶

Um den Multiprozessorbetrieb zu aktivieren öffnet man mit einem Editor [4] die Datei .q3a/baseq3/q3config.cfg und ändert den Punkt seta r_smp "0" in seta r_smp "1" um.

quake 3 page:

Dualcore

to activat the multicoremode open the data .q3a/baseq3/q3config.cfg with a editor and change the point seta r_smp "0" to seta r_smp "1"

LINK: http://wiki.ubuntuusers.de/Spiele/Quake3 (strg + f suche : r_smp "1" )

MEGA NUUUB !!!

ps: what do you think what dualcore is ? that are two seperate cpus / cores in one chassi , they only share the bus.

.
K1LLER say's, i just kicked ya ass!

Top
20. June 2009 - 21:57
#22
mow Q [EN]
Offline
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts:
NVIDIA vs ATI performance test
arQon wrote:

r_smp 1 hasn't worked reliably since 2000 or so.

Top
21. June 2009 - 0:22
#23
joey
Offline
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts:
NVIDIA vs ATI performance test

r_smp has problems, as invictus has stated
it causes freeze ups between map loads in most cases and in some cases using r_smp causes negative performance
this me talking from experience, it worked (slightly) on my AMD tower (though still froze between maps)however it does not work on my intel powered laptop

Top
21. June 2009 - 5:54
#24
K1LLER|GAME|PLAYER
BMF.Killer's picture
Offline
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts:
NVIDIA vs ATI performance test
K1LLER|GAME|PLAYER wrote:

there is some cfg command that should be able to make dualcore support possible for quake3 , but tested it , doesnt work !

.
K1LLER say's, i just kicked ya ass!

Top
21. June 2009 - 10:56
#25
fala'fag
dancing shadow's picture
Offline
Joined: May 2008
Posts:
NVIDIA vs ATI performance test
..ZMB..EPYKOI wrote:

come on! post result :]

censorship on YouTube sucks rabbit balls

Top
21. June 2009 - 13:08
#26
joey
Offline
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts:
NVIDIA vs ATI performance test
joey wrote:

Q3 1.32
5.5 seconds @ 229.6fps anisotropic 16x anti aliasing 16xQ
5.5 seconds @ 229.2fps anisotropic 16x anti aliasing 16x
3.8 seconds @ 346.2fps anisotropic 16x anti aliasing Skull
2.7 seconds @ 459.9fps anisotropic Skull anti aliasing 4x

Laptop Specs
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 @2.5ghz
3GB DDR2 @ 667
Nvidia GeForce 9500M GS (DX10)
Vista Home Premium

i disabled some uneeded services such as Ready Boost, Indexing, Themes, Wdefender, WFireall, and Search. I only tested the 8xAnisotropic and the 4x anti aliasing and the new result was:

2.1 seconds @ 634.9fps anisotropic Skull anti aliasing 4x

Top
21. June 2009 - 17:07
#27
K1LLER|GAME|PLAYER
BMF.Killer's picture
Offline
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts:
NVIDIA vs ATI performance test

3.3 seconds @ 377.9 fps anisotropic 16x antialiasing Skull

amd dualcore 4850e OC @ 2.8 ghz X2 , 2GB DDR2 PC-6400 , ati hd 4850, 640 GB SATAII harddisk 96mb /per second. win xp service pack 3

@ fala

as i said buy new cpu and you have what you want Winking

.
K1LLER say's, i just kicked ya ass!

Top
21. June 2009 - 19:00
#28
*ZMB*ORBY*
Offline
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts:
NVIDIA vs ATI performance test

here the results from Sabayon Linux 4.1 (Gentoo based)

same hardware and settings as on Bill's OS fail.

take this winzozz

Top
21. June 2009 - 23:10
#29
fala'fag
dancing shadow's picture
Offline
Joined: May 2008
Posts:
NVIDIA vs ATI performance test
K1LLER|GAME|PLAYER wrote:

numbers are more important to me then users personal opinions
because numbers show reality and opinions are only personal point of view which hasn't got anything in common with a truth recently

*ZMB*ORBY* wrote:

well, nvidia works on linux, ati struggle on linux, spend already one week trying to install on different distributions the dammed driver, if it works the score on ubuntu x64 was 133fps av :!:

censorship on YouTube sucks rabbit balls

Top
22. June 2009 - 12:55
#30
*ZMB*ORBY*
Offline
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts:
NVIDIA vs ATI performance test
fala'fag wrote:

spend already one week trying to install on different distributions..

my dad use my old pc athlon xp 3000+ with ati 9600pro..
i'll let u know if i find smth good for ati-penguin.
i can try it bcoz he fucked win xp.

for the lastest gfx card i can't give u a feedback.. ye, i have a 8800gts and when i bought it he beat ati in smoothness and fps (gfx in the same price range)..
but seems the lastest ati works well and some ppl..

the only 1 thing i know is: big shame for nvidia drivers..
ati full drivers vers 9.6 - 37.4mb
ati only drivers 9.6 - 15.1mb
nvidia 1 choice avaiable vers 186.18 - 102mb!! (installed, i don't want to know)

ciao!

Top