here is my test

Intel core 2 duo E8500 @3.16 GHZ
Asus p5q-E
4GB 400Hz
GTX 280
Directx 10
Vista Basic Home + sp1 (sp1 i think )

Anti-Aliasing x8 and Anisotropic x16

1,7 sec - 732.7 Fps

Anti-Aliasing x^4 and Anisotropic x8

1,7 759.5 fps

dont know if i made them right but ok

well i am sure that 280 is much more capable maybe i am too dumb every game plays so i dont really bother however i have to say

that i deactivated physx settings maybe thats why the fps are relatively so low!! who knows

i am not at home to make the test again with these settings on hehe

anyway i just can say that 280 rocks like hell!

ok i sayed, and i did, somehove i managed install graphic driver and run test inside small home pc holding place as server and router

so there they go:
hq. 36.5s - 35.4fps
low q. 24.7s - 51fps

and amazing power comes from:
debian os, intell mondecino 0.5ghz, ~390mb, Nvidia gf-100/200 2x/agp 32mb (160/180mhz)

so buy this one, main point why ?
its cheap
its consumes less power
u alaso can brake it for fun

Hi,

So with card on this topic takes a lead, gaining more overal sumed fps'es ?

And lets see, i'm home So her you go mine rezults:

1260frames.
4.0 seconds:
313.7 fps

this is max what i managed get from:
P4HT 2.5ghz, 512mb x840mhz,
NVIDIA Driver Version 173.14.09 Linux-x86, X.Org 11.0

GeForce 7600gs(128bit,agp8) 425x425mhz,

Cha cha beat me if you can
With that kind of older pc comparing to nova days rigs, it's kinda impresive fps.

just to show kaktus (or was it zont?) a possible score for a slow pc:

Athlon xp 1600+
256 mb ddr1 266
radeon 9200 se
winxp sp2

result: 72.6 fps.

also can reach stable 75-80 fps on dm0 at startroom and generally 100 fps on dm7 while driver is on default (driver setting matter a lot).

should be possible to get more out of that system though x) xp takes a lot fps imo.