NVIDIA vs ATI performance test

69 replies [Last post]
12. January 2010 - 23:21
#61
keke
Offline
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts:
NVIDIA vs ATI performance test

5770 is nothing.

only in 5850 or 5870 you really have smth in ur hands. 5870 is very close to nvidia's gtx295 2GB version but it's a LOT cheaper btw. So atm ATI hands down.

I can't wait for mine to be delivered.

Top
12. January 2010 - 23:32
#62
mow Q [EN]
Offline
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts:
NVIDIA vs ATI performance test

yea, its nothing, ^^

go and waste ur money... Wave

Top
12. January 2010 - 23:33
#63
keke
Offline
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts:
NVIDIA vs ATI performance test
mow Q [EN] wrote:

yea, its nothing, ^^

go and waste ur money... Wave

Already did waste them on a beautiful Intel i7 920, 8gb RAM, SSD drive and HD5870.

\o

Top
12. January 2010 - 23:50
#64
rUnThEoN?!
Site administrator
Skullheadq3's picture
Offline
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts:
DE Germany
NVIDIA vs ATI performance test

well, tomorrow ill try how many fps i can get out this low budget pc Tongue

hurrenson: "This idiot is apparently not familiar with a rail/sniper style."

Top
22. September 2011 - 22:47
#65
mow Q [EN]
Offline
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts:
Re: NVIDIA vs ATI performance test

Bought a new PC

scores for: || cpu : Phenom II x6 1100t || ram : 8GB DDR || gfx : Powercolour 6870 X2 ||

quake3 -> Win 7 Pro 64 bit -> 933,3 fps

(1260 frames in 1,4 seconds)

AF x 16

AA x 8

Top
23. September 2011 - 9:56
#66
..ZMB..EPYKOI
epykoi's picture
Offline
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts:
Re: NVIDIA vs ATI performance test

Why not checking general benchmarks ? Basically any video card will run Quake3 just fine with anisotropic etc.

As Mow Q told, HD5770 really is a good choice in terms of price/perf ratio.

Also, I did have a HD4870 until 4 moths ago, and it does still run any game AND Q3 wery nicely.

I just want to add one small point : I don't think having uber framerate is a plus, as long as your monitor can't handle all these frames and will only display them according to its refreshing rate.
FPS drop is not a problem as long as it does not go under 125FPS.

Cheers



Top
23. September 2011 - 11:16
#67
animalchik
fala.q3's picture
Offline
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts:
Re: NVIDIA vs ATI performance test
..ZMB..EPYKOI wrote:

it seems u still haven't got the point of if since so long time...

anyway everyone who have played noghost in clanbase have played it on 250 or 333fps because it helps u against the unlagged and shooting reactions, u can even test the 250fps on e+ if the server will allow it, if u ain't going to notice the game is smoother and rails feels far more instant than on 125 then dunno how to explain it to u Winking

I am addicted to life.

Top
23. September 2011 - 12:08
#68
andyrocket
andyrocket's picture
Offline
Joined: May 2011
Posts:
Re: NVIDIA vs ATI performance test

hq - zadrot o.o

"Can you see this light between us?" (c) Nikola Tesla

Top
23. September 2011 - 16:11
#69
..ZMB..EPYKOI
epykoi's picture
Offline
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts:
Re: NVIDIA vs ATI performance test
animalchik wrote:

..ZMB..EPYKOI wrote:

it seems u still haven't got the point of if since so long time...

anyway everyone who have played noghost in clanbase have played it on 250 or 333fps because it helps u against the unlagged and shooting reactions, u can even test the 250fps on e+ if the server will allow it, if u ain't going to notice the game is smoother and rails feels far more instant than on 125 then dunno how to explain it to u Winking

Allright then, I guess I might have missed this point.

Anyway, my first comment was saying that basically any 90+ euros graphic card will do just fine. I might come back later on this topic with FPS on HD4670/4870/5770/6970.

Byez



Top