wrote:

nVidia will be always better. Not in performance but in compatibility with apps and alternative OS. ATI sux :!:

True

Nvidia (<3333) >shit>shit>shit>ATI

wrote:

wrote:

ATI sux

nope. ATI > nvidia

before you write something like this ^ please try your ati graphic card on another OS than windows You can also found problems with compatibility on older games. Its not problem of software developers. Its problem of ati drivers. nVidia rox :!:

So with card on this topic takes a lead, gaining more overal sumed fps'es ?
Or whats the point of topic then ?? Topic says clearly so wheres some conclusions xD ? Did i missed betven spam here ? Rrr :}

As i see all cares only to show what cind o f tru powa they have, "behold thats my fig" ups i meaned rig.. oh nwm...

Another results rrrr i boroved a video card from my sisters pc .. just for testing purpose:

1260frames.
4.6seconds:
279.7 fps

this is max what i managed get from:
P4HT 2.5ghz, 512mb x840mhz,
NVIDIA Driver Version 173.14.09 Linux-x86, X.Org 11.0

GeForce FX5900XT 390x700mhz,

Hi,

bastards, let me do a dirty job, lets CAUNT cunts juice comes out here ,

ATI vs NVIDIA on q3 here it goes:
(total fps on this topic counted in for)

NVIDIA - 6361 fps's (avg 530fps/rig)
ATI - 1654 fps's (avg 330fps/rig)

Nvidia - wins.