Plus.cfg Download and Suggestions

229 replies [Last post]
5. December 2006 - 22:19
#11
*A*C|_ASS*WON]<O
vroomfoondel's picture
Offline
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts:
asfdsdaf

i agree with rat. i guess the difference between the 2 approaches would be that in avoiding splash back lg would become a more generally used weapon as opposed to a shortrange finishing weapon it is as of now.

#e+pickup #excessiveplus #class.clan

Top
6. December 2006 - 0:20
#12
mow Q [EN]
Offline
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts:
Re: asfdsdaf
*A*C|_ASS*WON]<O wrote:

i agree with rat. i guess the difference between the 2 approaches would be that in avoiding splash back lg would become a more generally used weapon as opposed to a shortrange finishing weapon it is as of now.

splash = changing movementphysics xD

but anyway, as soon i have dsl, i think i will make a testserver, (2!S Freez Test or something), where i add the suggestions in here,

but this still can take weeks.

Top
6. December 2006 - 0:26
#13
NecrogeddoN
necrogeddon's picture
Offline
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts:
Plus.cfg Download and Suggestions

Awesome! Big grin

  • NVidia GeForce 8400GS

  • Logitech MX510

  • Hyperglide Teflon Skates

  • Steelpad QcK+

  • iHome IH-K200MB

  • SB Live! 5.1 Platinum

  • Logitech Precision Gaming Headphones

  • Insignia 32" HDTV

Top
6. December 2006 - 0:31
#14
madbringer
Madbringer's picture
Offline
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts:
Plus.cfg Download and Suggestions

Top
6. December 2006 - 8:21
#15
Astro BoY
Explosive's picture
Offline
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts:
Plus.cfg Download and Suggestions

lol that pic is great Happy

^o^

Top
6. December 2006 - 8:21
#16
Arax'KG
ar4xis's picture
Offline
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts:
Plus.cfg Download and Suggestions

Stupendous!

Top
6. December 2006 - 16:23
#17
NINJA |¯?¯OLDVAMP¯?¯|
OldVamp's picture
Offline
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts:
Plus.cfg Download and Suggestions

how about gernades that kill on impact Big grin
Thats really the only thing I cant stand about the plus config

Top
6. December 2006 - 16:46
#18
Warren G
FELiX's picture
Offline
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts:
Plus.cfg Download and Suggestions
RATSALAD wrote:

SERLANT wrote:
i was thinking the LG shouldnt be like that else you might aswell use the MG it should have less damage and a lil more splash so that i can be used with less aim for close encounters etc. but the mg is still more usefull at medium-long range

I suppose what I'm suggesting does go against what's common in E+. I guess I'm more spouting general Quake 3 ideology opposed to the E+ ideology. LG splash damage doesn't exist outside of E+ afaik.

But on osp/cpma do u have insta rail or bfg? In e+ we have other weapon power and balance between weapon must stay cuz if we will kick splash damage from plus.cfg ihmo it will be total unusefull weapon agains insta rail or bfg.

Top
6. December 2006 - 17:03
#19
RATSALAD
ratsalad's picture
Offline
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts:
Plus.cfg Download and Suggestions
FEL!X wrote:

RATSALAD wrote:
SERLANT wrote:
i was thinking the LG shouldnt be like that else you might aswell use the MG it should have less damage and a lil more splash so that i can be used with less aim for close encounters etc. but the mg is still more usefull at medium-long range

I suppose what I'm suggesting does go against what's common in E+. I guess I'm more spouting general Quake 3 ideology opposed to the E+ ideology. LG splash damage doesn't exist outside of E+ afaik.

But on osp/cpma do u have insta rail or bfg? In e+ we have other weapon power and balance between weapon must stay cuz if we will kick splash damage from plus.cfg ihmo it will be total unusefull weapon agains insta rail or bfg.

You do have a point there Flex Happy Well, could always make the LG a little stronger than it currently is. Since you use OSP and CPMA as example... LG is a touch stronger than the MG in those mods. In CPMA MG = 5hp damage, and LG = 8hp damage. Currently you have both MG and LG's damage at 25hp, so maybe bring the LG up to 30hp? Happy

But then again... making it a little stronger probably won't compensate for the splash damage's absence.

Top
18. January 2007 - 1:55
#20
1337W4R3Z )NWC(
1337w4r3z's picture
Offline
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts:
MX Mexico
Plus.cfg Download and Suggestions

Since we'll be playing the ctf masters cup i found some new interest in plus cfg, i would like to make an observation about this cfg, i think that for ctf mode it will be better if you guys dissable multijumps, it is just my personal point of view and also some of my clan makes consider that mj and ctf don't mix, just my 2 cents, i'll be testing the cfg more extensively cause there are some other issues i would like to point but first i'll make sure i know what i'm talking about, i hope at least no mj can be implemented for ctf mode.

Thank you in advance for you time and to flex ko for the link to this thread.

Top