Plus.cfg Download and Suggestions

229 replies [Last post]
18. January 2007 - 3:33
#21
*A*C|_ASS*WON]<O
vroomfoondel's picture
Offline
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts:
Plus.cfg Download and Suggestions

y not remove multi-jumps throughout? or is that too extreme. or rather not excessive enough? mjs just seem a little redundant and lame when u have all these weapon jump options available.

#e+pickup #excessiveplus #class.clan

Top
18. January 2007 - 4:05
#22
NecrogeddoN
necrogeddon's picture
Offline
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts:
Plus.cfg Download and Suggestions
*A*C|_ASS*WON]<O wrote:

y not remove multi-jumps throughout? or is that too extreme. or rather not excessive enough? mjs just seem a little redundant and lame when u have all these weapon jump options available.

Hm, let's just play baseq3 and forget about Excessive Plus. Winking

  • NVidia GeForce 8400GS

  • Logitech MX510

  • Hyperglide Teflon Skates

  • Steelpad QcK+

  • iHome IH-K200MB

  • SB Live! 5.1 Platinum

  • Logitech Precision Gaming Headphones

  • Insignia 32" HDTV

Top
18. January 2007 - 4:12
#23
*A*C|_ASS*WON]<O
vroomfoondel's picture
Offline
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts:
Plus.cfg Download and Suggestions

aw come on! it wasnt THAT bad. Big grin

#e+pickup #excessiveplus #class.clan

Top
18. January 2007 - 7:36
#24
CZE|BEAZT
beazt's picture
Offline
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts:
CZ Czech Republic
Plus.cfg Download and Suggestions

switchtime -1 rulezZz \:D/

Apple Mac mini M4 + Apple Magic Keyboard + Logitech G603

Top
18. January 2007 - 8:33
#25
mow Q [EN]
Offline
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts:
Plus.cfg Download and Suggestions

As the most of the bro-side have no idea what ctf is, and how it is played the best way 1337, i take ur suggestion in my list, because it is no problem to disable mjs for ctf only.

But pls, don't except a change in plus.cfg within for masterscup.

Top
18. January 2007 - 11:36
#26
x.foksie'loy.drt?
foksie's picture
Offline
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts:
Plus.cfg Download and Suggestions
FEL!X wrote:

Cuz we want to save old granates from nh.cfg. It was when explode granates was new on bro. I think in next relase of plus.cfg, granates on duel will be same like on other gametypes.

holy fuck! dont...

instead consider this: rocket with nade kickback. or maybe plasma for moving like that.

but removing sticky nades = killing 1v1. imo.

I am proud of spreading a pirated Excessive Plus version and claim to be the original author, yay!

Top
18. January 2007 - 12:10
#27
Warren G
FELiX's picture
Offline
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts:
Plus.cfg Download and Suggestions
x.foksie'loy.drt? wrote:

FEL!X wrote:
I think in next relase of plus.cfg,granates on duel will be same like on other gametypes.

holy fuck! dont...

instead consider this: rocket with nade kickback. or maybe plasma for moving like that.

but removing sticky nades = killing 1v1. imo.

Its only propostion cuz i heard offen opinion about change granates. In my post i should use word "suppose". For ur info, im only thinking about this prob, but before change smth we will test it and make ask duel players about opinion. So dont worry.

Top
18. January 2007 - 16:49
#28
x.foksie'loy.drt?
foksie's picture
Offline
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts:
Plus.cfg Download and Suggestions

if you need testers, you know my PM Happy

I am proud of spreading a pirated Excessive Plus version and claim to be the original author, yay!

Top
18. January 2007 - 20:59
#29
1337W4R3Z )NWC(
1337w4r3z's picture
Offline
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts:
MX Mexico
Plus.cfg Download and Suggestions
mow Q [EN] wrote:

As the most of the bro-side have no idea what ctf is, and how it is played the best way 1337, i take ur suggestion in my list, because it is no problem to disable mjs for ctf only.

But pls, don't except a change in plus.cfg within for masterscup.

It is fine by me if it happens after the masters cup seems one good step to unify cfgs and if this end up being a suitable cfg for ctf we´ll use it for our server as standard cfg.

Thanx for your reply mow.

Top
18. January 2007 - 21:26
#30
plastrom
Offline
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts:
Plus.cfg Download and Suggestions

well, i dont like the idea of a plus-ctf without multijumps, it will remove many of the possibilities of ctf-movement, some moves can be replaced by lg/nade (see e5, nwc...), but many others wont work. it would be a real harsh change for many players who love to play plus-ctf Happy

the distance between nwc-conf or maybe also e5r would perhaps fall apart but replaced by another situation: old-plus vs new-plus...it would be hard to play any fw vs clans when they get used to play without multijumps, and they will if it gets official.

multijumps are one of the characteristics (beneath physics 2 or instarail) of plus-ctf-community (e.g. peeps playing on 2!sweet and zoo-ctf) that define "us". plus without multijumps would imho loose one of its main "advantages" vs e5/e5r and result in a slower e5 with less possibilities.

Top