[ r e w i e v ] razer deathadder - © KO archives

29 replies [Last post]
9. August 2007 - 11:52
#21
ghost
Offline
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts:
[ r e w i e v ] razer deathadder - © KO archives

y i did Happy

Top
9. August 2007 - 12:57
#22
torzelan.com
TorZelan's picture
Offline
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts:
[ r e w i e v ] razer deathadder - © KO archives
. wrote:

@Torzelan: Do u mean that very short moves with the crosshair like the mouse is lagging? I saw that in fatal1ty and some other demos,could never understand whats happening there.

Haven't really seen it in Fat (but I never used to watch demos from painkiller or quake 4, too much hassle, just saw streams in mediocre quality Happy but watch a CPMA demo with LuGia to see exactly what I mean... Simply like having a mouse that updates position extremely rarely and it looks like ass to be honest but on the other hand he and his rediculously low sensitivity is known as more or less the best shafter in CPMA. Would just be cool to know what he/they've done to get it like that and what exactly the tradeoff is (what's good and bad with it).

-edit-
Thanks HQ btw, guess there's nothing to do about it then :[


Top
9. August 2007 - 13:10
#23
.
Offline
Joined: May 2005
Posts:
[ r e w i e v ] razer deathadder - © KO archives

y i also saw it in cpma/osp demos.So i think i know what u mean,and y,i would like to found out more about it as well.Maybe polish players who know pro players irl could tell us more Tongue

Top
9. August 2007 - 23:23
#24
.
emaciej's picture
Offline
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts:
[ r e w i e v ] razer deathadder - © KO archives
ghost wrote:

...unfortunaly im cant find this thing in poland...

I found it by accident, during browsing pads offers, here you go

http://www.4max.pl/default.asp?g=109&gg=107&produkt=1264

Top
9. August 2007 - 23:46
#25
Warren G
FELiX's picture
Offline
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts:
[ r e w i e v ] razer deathadder - © KO archives

@torz

cpma demos has lower rate than demos from e+ baseq3 or osp. Its for get smaller demos. Exactly this same effect u can see in players who loses packets or have to low cl_maxpackets value (cl_maxpackets 30 on server run on 30 fps)

Top
10. August 2007 - 0:28
#26
torzelan.com
TorZelan's picture
Offline
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts:
[ r e w i e v ] razer deathadder - © KO archives

How does that affect only LuGia? x)


Top
10. August 2007 - 13:20
#27
madbringer
Madbringer's picture
Offline
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts:
[ r e w i e v ] razer deathadder - © KO archives
. wrote:

Maybe polish players who know pro players irl could tell us more Tongue

I'd like to help out but i don't know any low sensers. Maybe LuGia uses nudge?

Top
11. August 2007 - 6:57
#28
NecrogeddoN
necrogeddon's picture
Offline
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts:
[ r e w i e v ] razer deathadder - © KO archives
FEL!X wrote:

@torz

cpma demos has lower rate than demos from e+ baseq3 or osp.

lol and the DF team won't use the new promode physics code. It runs at 75fps now Big grin as I recall hearing the story told ArQon asked the Defrag team if they'd like the new code and they said bugger off. Laughing

  • NVidia GeForce 8400GS

  • Logitech MX510

  • Hyperglide Teflon Skates

  • Steelpad QcK+

  • iHome IH-K200MB

  • SB Live! 5.1 Platinum

  • Logitech Precision Gaming Headphones

  • Insignia 32" HDTV

Top
23. August 2007 - 13:45
#29
ghost
Offline
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts:
[ r e w i e v ] razer deathadder - © KO archives

the final words meybe?

an two weaks ago im discowered some important things about all kind of mices

so size of mouse fets are ones of moust important things if comes to mouse sensor behaving

i had g5 fets on mine mx500 and homemade fets on mine mx510 it was way esier for me to make traction los on mx500 but, im dont remember wot for now, im changes fets betwen these mouses, then mx510 started to lose traction way fater same as it was hapening prviously on mx500 and mx500 with biger fets dint losed traction almoust at all as it it was before in case of mx510
also the feling of sensitivity changed, measuring disctances on the same settings in windows and q3 im noticed mouse with toler fets making less cm per turn as before Shock

another thing, im tried to measure on DA croshair behevior depending about settings of windows sensitivity slider, im dint tried to set it max to right couse even withnout it DA is to fast for me, so im did decrested from 50/50 position to 20/80 to the left then tested it in q3 and program

the efect? DA in q3 started to asct like ie 3.0, i mean the damed flustrating negative aceleration, also the program showed me mismasch in calculations wich was sugesting mouse will have wrong pointing out results, so im quickly jumped to conclusion setting windows pointer like 80/20 will give me positive acceleration but after test in q3 it still gived me nagative acceleration not positive as im previously thinked it will hapen

when windows sensitivity slider is set to 50/50 mouse dosent have negative aceleration, make settings like 60/40 or 40/60 cause negative acceleration in game so watch out for it and live windows slider at 50/50 change only DA driver sensitivity slider :!:

:!: EURECA :!:

so im did throwed out standard mouse fets from DA and mounted on it homemade a bit toler feats out of technic teflon, atm mine DA works like F1 its reaching the same speeds withnout losing traction as mine mx510 in normal gameplay its imposible to make it los traction Idea

also mouse sensitivity fell changed and croshair becomed more stable as before, ofc mx510 hast still beter cotrol on it but the deference now isint so big as before Idea

combined with shape fix and surface fix gived me mouse wich is realy damed good defenitly the best razer mice wich they ever madet

if u will ask me if it is beter than mx510 the answer is im dont know, im think i like the fixed shape more than an mx one but mx510 has a bit more control in croshair

but u must consider of making these 3 fixes if comes to DA if u plan to buy it withnout them mouse isint defenitly as that good :roll:

Top