fps, its free for events to be part of the official E+ ranking, not other way round, for example fragfests.

It is a rule that is unnecessary, its a rule to much there and imo it isn't the only one, why you deleted old rule thread anyways? It was quite balanced.

wrote:

Or with other words you won't discuss about a rule with someone who says the rule is so bad he wont follow it? Isn't that a lame way of acting? especially for a rank mod?

Hm, skull, recheck again what I said.

wrote:

Offourse, Darkangel, you are free not to take this rule as a rule, you can also not to take PB/Pure rule as a rule or whatever else. The point is as far as it was implemented, you will have to respect it or you will be punished according to the current warning system. I won't even discuss such things, while you are officialy notice that you arent goin to follow one of rules.
I'm up to discuss this rule or any another, but if you realy want this rule to be deleted, you will have to give me a solid arguments not just like - we are lazy/it wasnt rank related and so on.

I repeat that Im up to discuss any rule or any case related to the rank side. That's what Im actually doing right now. I could just forget about this topic because only ONE clan and nobody else complains. I told that I wont discuss the official statements from a clan leaders sounding like - " My clan wont respect or follow this rule and I dont care at all". I dont care about this statements, Ill easly without any doubts give a punishments accroding to a warning system.

wrote:

On top of that the best argument is that the rule doesn't bring any benefit to the ranking.

Could you know? The thing I know is there was a couple of precendents in the past. And this rule grealt regulates it.

wrote:

I disagree with the rule since every rule should only exist to make stuff easier, as shown it did NOT.

This rule does. It determined a responsible persons. Can clanleader edit his database? Yes, he can. He should. Players shouldn't hurt if some of clanleaders are inactive. Example : Style is now listed as in Sneaky as in Lucky clans. What a ref of the tomorow's CW would say? If there wasnt a "new clan members topic" he would just disallow him from a game, because he listed in both clans. I doubt style d agree with that and there would be a great flame continued after game into the report topic.

wrote:

fps, its free for events to be part of the official E+ ranking, not other way round, for example fragfests.

It is a rule that is unnecessary, its a rule to much there and imo it isn't the only one, why you deleted old rule thread anyways? It was quite balanced.

Yes, its free, thats why ranking rules are touching only event games which is going to be ranked.

Non-ranking events like 'Vanilla Cup' or any other same having nothing with ranking rules.

There was nothing balanced. It didnt regulate a lot of important cases. However, it was just moved into the private corner. And the current rule edition includes no major changes. Just everything needed to be done is done now.

Let me formulate it in a different way, we will not follow the rule they it is right now since it needs in our opinion further discussion.

wrote:

On top of that the best argument is that the rule doesn't bring any benefit to the ranking.

wrote:

Could you know? The thing I know is there was a couple of precendents in the past. And this rule grealt regulates it.

I am sorry, but the animal in 3m case would have been zero problems if people would have acted 100% to clandb, since it was up to date as both, animal and darky mentioned. The problem came because new member thread was involved, or with other words, you seen a rule fail and do the same mistake again? Create a rule that is already known to cause problems? And how you argument that animal was allowed to play that cup round when he is according to the rule you wrote down and that was 99% same in event rules not really allowed to play? I already told you a lot of suggestions, nevertheless you are like "ignore the problem and allow the rule" which is unacceptable imo.

wrote:

I disagree with the rule since every rule should only exist to make stuff easier, as shown it did NOT.

wrote:

This rule does. It determined a responsible persons. Can clanleader edit his database? Yes, he can. He should. Players shouldn't hurt if some of clanleaders are inactive.

In my opinion it does not. We have both cases at hand, clanleader being hurt because player posted something in a non related thread (animal) or clan being hurt because clanleader is to lazy to keep clandb up to date (style). In either case, a direct question to clanleader or player could solve the problem, instead you force ALL players and clans/Leaders to apply to your rule which only comes in at odd situations, while sametime, both, leaders and players, dislike hopping and care about their reputation?

@darky, as far i see he have pointed out the topic have bigger priority, but in the topic anyone can write anything, just like we did to r2 to show them how ridiculous their demands are