wrote:

Sorry, but I didn't understand a shit. The thing I've particularly got, you are trying to point about the some jurisdiction. I'm not changing any event/cup rules. The rule says any event matches related to the rank should be played according as with event rules as with ranking rules. Nothing new in that. About "new clanmembers" topic I told you - from now on, it regulates not only the event cases, but also an usual clanwars.

I'm not changing any event/cup rules. Yes u do by extending the CUP rules u give them other meaning... All thought the CUP is completely in depended from ranking, u can judge games not the CUP in the general... hope u finally going to get u are out of yours jurisdiction.

And it happens because there are no rule about game pause in the ranking rules at all, so the rule itself for ranking is useless, unless u going to combine it together with CUP rules. So it actually does changes only the CUP rules not the ranking rules...

wrote:

like that silly santa tag of 3M, where is that posted ?

Oh yeas exactly a good example!

And then some "#$%" going to argue santas aren't allowed to play...

Are u guys seriously doesn't seeing how ridiculous it is?

Juts the same to demand a WO or to kick player out of the server, while knowing he was joking from the start... Rules should help ppl and prevent unfair situation and not cause them... doh

wrote:

I'm not changing any event/cup rules. Yes u do by extending the CUP rules u give them other meaning... All thought the CUP is completely in depended from ranking, u can judge games not the CUP in the general... hope u finally going to get u are out of yours jurisdiction.

Do I now need to drop down to explain it like for the five-year child?
Tell me how it happened that I judged a cup in general?

We have a rule down bellow:

5. Ranking event rules should be brought in compliance with ranking rules.

Is there something wrong do you think? Should be only so and nohow opposite. If the eventmanager decided play games for the rank, all of them should be played under ranking rules. If the eventmanager estabilished a rule - "all games should be played without PB and Pure but every match is going to be ranked", this rule will not have any positive result, because ranking rules are saying - "Pure and PB must be turned ON".

Cup can be completely independent from the ranking only in case if its matches wont be ranked. Example is Vanilla Cup. An eventmanager decided to play without PB and PURE. He could decide to disallow banana from the event. Or he could just disallow personally you from the game. He even could play with random gauntlet-only config with players he choosed. By other words - HE IS FREE TO SET ANY RULE HE WANTS.

wrote:

Was i pointing out that u are a moron or something?

If u can't discus on a civil level then don't. And the fact that u get down to insults leads to only one conclusion, i am losing time here since it seems it not mater of a true arguments but some meanless forum fights. Its like talking to a wall.

I didnt want to insult anyone. I replyed on ur non-fair accuses and expressed my opinion more detailed. I provided an explanation for you, and detailed reasons for skull. Im here not for flamefight too. Peace and sorry for offence from my side.

The rule requires a more precise formulation.

In order not to create a mess, it will be formulated so:

"Clan leaders are obliged to keep their clan database updated, in case of opposite, players are obliged to update their status manually using new clan members topic".

By using other words, we are giving a priority to the clan DB, a topic would be like a "spare exit" for the people which by some reasons werent updated in DB.

Making false statements using new clan members topics is forbidden. Any issues regarding such incidents will function in an immidieate warning, or a yellow card if it happens numerous times.

Rank Moderation.

wrote:

solid argument is:

in whole life of e+ wasnt such rule, so imo its not necessary at all.

pb and pure are totaly different things with this one.

All know marcus is ia a bit on lucky, so i dont think there will be any problem with style, since all in e+ know that story about lucky (ia clan).

solid argument is , we have clan db, its own resposability of a new player who joined some clan, to bother about his ex clan and be delated, you can always ask epsilon or some clan db moderator to delate you, since the clan or team is not active.

So what we have got?

New player who did joined new clan cos his old ex clan is ia, can easly call administrator by pm or moderator of clan db, to tell him the situation and be delated from that clan.

Its his own responsability of the new player to do such thing, and if he does not do it, he cant be part of anyother clan cos it will be consideration multiclaning.

Or for what we do have administrators and clan db moderators? to accept clans and teams and have 2500 them in e+? or make their duty and do their job what ask the player.

I guess its clear explanation of why we dont need such rule, since from all time we had this, players asked moderatos to delate them if the clan leader is ia.

So, no need to force clan leaders or co leaders or members, to write in that topic, i repeat, that topic is only and stricktly for ''information for excessiveplus comunity'' wich is not related to rank at all.

Agree, when I wanted to be out from rsqt and die, both leaders didn't want to delete me from clandb :E
So I asked Epsilon to do it for me
Also I like the bit about clandb moderators duty Right now their job is just about clicking "accept" button. Pls atleast make an winter or spring cleaning once a year, because right now we have 999clans and I got so confused that I don't know which one should I join