I would suggest to skip the rule and rather handle every situation individually - because i dont think there are enough good players who have an lag thats unfair enough to actually have any need of such a rule.

decision should go over to ref who should talk it out with clanleaders of an actual match.

*bump*

I am strictly against such a rule. The rule can and will be absolutly abused. And i do not see alot of refs who have the technical knowledge to do the right decissions. We have a big lack of unbiased refs, there is no way to make fair decissions for all. A rule have to be fair for all, and this rule is a one-way rule, means not fair, and not fair to implement.

Actually i couldn't care less, since i have a absolutly smooth connection, i just try to have a look over the edge. People like mnc, ultima, miguel, shell etc will never be able to play a ranked war again..., that is pure discrimanation.

refs wich can handle this by technical knowledge in a unbiased way in my oppinion: skull, zont, blackfx, kaktus, and that was it already, and that is too less. The rest is 1. too biased or 2nd have not the technical knowledge. or maybe a 3rd point, "easy to influence by a raging player"

wrote:

I also would like to have a rule against assholes xd

yea, ofc, but that would discriminate myself :\

why cant you just set some guidleines

say if a player reaches above 30% loss then he must spec, this way as soon as sum1 hits a little loss the opponents cant just say omg he lags i wont play Vs him forcespec omg...

as such this wont be a rule just a 'guideline' that if it does get so bad then here is a maximum amount of loss someone can play with before we start to decide if he can play or not.