Do E+ need a ranking rule about laggers?

71 replies [Last post]
3M'blackrose
Black _Rose's picture
Offline
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts:
Re: Do E+ need a ranking rule about laggers?
mow Q [EN] wrote:

The problem is more, the left hand, darkangel, does not know what the right hand (black rose) is doing.

Which means, giving different facts to the same request.

Please tell me, when you 2 pull the same rope.

"I agree to change rule how it suggested FPS." reread this please may be after 1764537 time you will understand:)
that is not my problem that you Impius all understand wrong. EVEN IN MY little country Moldova ( i am sure that only few from you know where this country situated) exist normal internet with which i play without lags in quake . and i dont trust that in Poland dosent exist normal internet providers . i remember that ultima played before without lags. And as you see IMpius Ultima played this cw vs lucky and lucky were not against him. so this dosent mean that lagers will not play cw any more. And refs will decide if this player lager or not. So, my average hand, dont exaggerate with this right and left hands Happy

mow Q [EN]
Offline
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts:
Re: Do E+ need a ranking rule about laggers?

Well, the comprehension problems are not on my side...

Problem is, you post different things from what darkangel is posting. The confusion is built by u 2, thats why u have to deal withit now.

And that u don't believe that people can do nothing (temporary or always) about their connection just proofs, that you have not enough technical knowledge.... Again, it has not much to do with the provider how your connection works. It is more the local technical cirumstances. God thx i have a cable connection and not stupid DSL, but just a example, before cable was available for me. It is about the living area where i live. Frontside of the area have DSL 6.000, if go on just 2 streats, u get just DSL 3.000, after more 4 streats u just get dsl 500, at the ende of this area u get NO DSL. Between the 500 dsl and no DSL you have a fucking stupid connection with lags, and no provider can do anything about it without investing a lot of money.

God thx there is cable available since 1 and a half year, but before you wasn't able to do anything in this dead-zone.

Don't get me wrong, you 2 are nice persons, but this is getting out of hand in my oppinion.

3M'darkangel
darkangelspa's picture
Offline
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts:
Re: Do E+ need a ranking rule about laggers?

But Impius, i said im agree to change the rules as fps sugested, and rose said the same Smug


Gloria Mōmentum
Talent wins games, but teamwork and intelligence wins championships.”



“There is no hunting like the hunting of man, and those who have hunted armed men long enough and liked it, never care for anything else thereafter.”
—Ernest Hemingway

3M'blackrose
Black _Rose's picture
Offline
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts:
Re: Do E+ need a ranking rule about laggers?
mow Q [EN] wrote:

Well, the comprehension problems are not on my side...

Problem is, you post different things from what darkangel is posting. The confusion is built by u 2, thats why u have to deal withit now.

And that u don't believe that people can do nothing (temporary or always) about their connection just proofs, that you have not enough technical knowledge....

Don't get me wrong, you 2 are nice persons, but this is getting out of hand in my oppinion.

ooo Impius stop it. as i say this is not my problem that you read our posts and see different things:) I SAY WE WILL CHANGE IT AS FPS SUGGESTED. darky wrote the same.
23 for yes, 28 for yes but if this rule will be modificated 28+ 23= 51
35 no.

so for yes voted more players.

3M'darkangel
darkangelspa's picture
Offline
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts:
Re: Do E+ need a ranking rule about laggers?

there are many peopel who think is good rule but need to be modificate, there are also many peopel who think is unnecessary...so we maked a rule that can fit both sides
Clans can agree to play or not with lager.
Ref decides what will happen with lager.


Gloria Mōmentum
Talent wins games, but teamwork and intelligence wins championships.”



“There is no hunting like the hunting of man, and those who have hunted armed men long enough and liked it, never care for anything else thereafter.”
—Ernest Hemingway

JUMPS'FPS!
fps's picture
Offline
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts:
Re: Do E+ need a ranking rule about laggers?

omg, even the dumbcake would understand the meaning of last mods messages here. Repeat to him 10 more times with a BIG TEXT SIZE please. Or better close this topic, its useless now, even the unknown people which didnt share their opinion in this thread voted more " yes" than "no".

mow Q [EN]
Offline
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts:
Re: Do E+ need a ranking rule about laggers?
3M'blackrose wrote:

Impius why i should take this vote seriously? I dont know who voted here, may be some kids who dont know for what they voted or other votes which are based only on attitude to us. I agree to change rule how it suggested FPS.

Nothing to add. You can continue to complain but nothing will change:)

Until the top of this page u had no correction of ur statement, dear black rose.

OH, and please 1/3 warning to fps, just for fair play.

mi3 * blackfx -C4-BLACKFX
BlackFx's picture
Offline
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts:
Re: Do E+ need a ranking rule about laggers?

those 28 for not modify, don't add it to 2nd point.

3M'blackrose
Black _Rose's picture
Offline
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts:
Re: Do E+ need a ranking rule about laggers?
mow Q [EN] wrote:

3M'blackrose wrote:
Impius why i should take this vote seriously? I dont know who voted here, may be some kids who dont know for what they voted or other votes which are based only on attitude to us. I agree to change rule how it suggested FPS.

Nothing to add. You can continue to complain but nothing will change:)

Until the top of this page u had no correction of ur statement, dear black rose.

OH, and please 1/3 warning to fps, just for fair play.

BEFORE nothing change = this rule will be not deleted i wrote rule will be changed as say Fps and after this

FX
"BUT current rule edition". we will change some things. but as i say this rule will be not removed.

mow Q [EN]
Offline
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts:
Re: Do E+ need a ranking rule about laggers?

.......