Future Clan Ranking - discusion !

145 replies [Last post]

13. May 2006 - 13:01

#81

Offline

Joined: May 2005

Posts:

Future Clan Ranking - discusion !

wrote:

I dont agree as this system has a lot of holes that can be used to level up. Take for example 2 teams playing rank clanwar against eachother every second day.

We already talk about it previously, that's why i talk about a ratio, and to not count it if clan abuse of this. But i don't believe this will happen even once, i believe too in a serious clanleader in 99% of clans. Maybe u didn't read my whole post about the system.

wrote:

Also I dont believe in giving advantages to older clans. League system works great in league - but in a ranking more important should be death/kill ratio.

We don't give advantage to older clan, KO won much more games against almost all teams than every other clans since 2006, i summed up the results from 2006 and you can see that KTM, over 3 wars came in the top 10 and 2sweet over 3 matchs too came in the top 5. Why? cauz they ownz the best and i think it's fair counting.

btw lol It's not a league and no, a league reset score each season and don't give advantage...

13. May 2006 - 13:40

#82

Offline

Joined: Jun 2005

Posts:

Future Clan Ranking - discusion !

Well for bodz proposition, it is significantly simpler. and if i may, id like to suggest a few things that would make it unnecessary to reset at all.

what i suggest is adding a little thing called clan level, wich every clan will collect over time. you win a clan who is grosly over your level, you win a looot more points. it is simmilar to what bodz suggests, but it also takes into account a new clan showing up with 0 points while first clan has several hunders. simply winning that clan will result in much more points.

the basic is, the longer the ranking exists, the more points ALL games bring. ill post what i mean soon.

I am proud of spreading a pirated Excessive Plus version and claim to be the original author, yay!

13. May 2006 - 16:45

#83

Offline

Joined: Nov 2003

Posts:

Future Clan Ranking - discusion !

wrote:

Well for bodz proposition, it is significantly simpler. and if i may, id like to suggest a few things that would make it unnecessary to reset at all.

yes its simpler if u cant count :]

13. May 2006 - 18:52

#84

Offline

Joined: Nov 2005

Posts:

Future Clan Ranking - discusion !

Why inventing "hot wather" ? What You spoke here is CocaCola FIFA ranking.

Diference is that Bodz system have minus points wich is destimulating. Clans want play if any risk is to earn minus points. In stymulating ranking both sides earn points but verry diferent amount Must be consider that losing team earn points but not to much to play alot CW and on that way easy ear alot points thats all

Please read FIFA rank and what I thing we can simplify a litle bit and have great ranking for our needs

Regards.

BBSQUAD CLAN
- All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. Time to die...

13. May 2006 - 23:25

#85

Future Clan Ranking - discusion !

i got a simple rank !

3 points win 1 point draw 0 point loss..

Easy peasy!

Just make a good table with lots of info
eg Games Played - Games Won - Frags etc

13. May 2006 - 23:47

#86

Offline

Joined: May 2005

Posts:

Future Clan Ranking - discusion !

wrote:

i got a simple rank !

3 points win 1 point draw 0 point loss..

Easy peasy!

Just make a good table with lots of info
eg Games Played - Games Won - Frags etc

I don't think you got why we wanted to make new rules lol.
Maybe you should read from the begining, what you propose is same than actual ranking but just see the actual rank :
_ooc and hk ranked better than drt.
_deva, bbs ranked better than lemon .

Personnaly it shows nothing about real skill of the clan. It show that some clans played only against easy teams in clanwars, and some other who did big challenges not rewarded.
That's why i proposed a new idea on page 2. Close than actual ranking, easy to do but i feel a bit alone exept foksie who suggests like me advices and new possible ways of ranking. Even if for me we should make primary something very easy to do then add options to improve it, foksie prefer to make something performed from the starting .

Well i don't find many other constructive posts than i don't like it or it's league when it's clearly and obviously not or finding many probs when there is not.

I made a new rank from 1st jan 2006 in 15 min with a pen and a paper and posted here so people who says that the rank i made with new rules doesn't reflect reality tell it now and why

regards

14. May 2006 - 8:15

#87

Offline

Joined: Aug 2004

Posts:

Future Clan Ranking - discusion !

wrote:

wrote:
i got a simple rank !

3 points win 1 point draw 0 point loss..

Easy peasy!

Just make a good table with lots of info
eg Games Played - Games Won - Frags etc

I don't think you got why we wanted to make new rules lol.
Maybe you should read from the begining, what you propose is same than actual ranking but just see the actual rank :
_ooc and hk ranked better than drt.
_deva, bbs ranked better than lemon .

Personnaly it shows nothing about real skill of the clan. It show that some clans played only against easy teams in clanwars, and some other who did big challenges not rewarded.
That's why i proposed a new idea on page 2. Close than actual ranking, easy to do but i feel a bit alone exept foksie who suggests like me advices and new possible ways of ranking. Even if for me we should make primary something very easy to do then add options to improve it, foksie prefer to make something performed from the starting .

Well i don't find many other constructive posts than i don't like it or it's league when it's clearly and obviously not or finding many probs when there is not.

I made a new rank from 1st jan 2006 in 15 min with a pen and a paper and posted here so people who says that the rank i made with new rules doesn't reflect reality tell it now and why

regards

pfff.... HK only played against easy clans pffff..... i think you should look at who we did play and stop making assumptions about which clan is at which level surely this is what the ranking is for...

14. May 2006 - 10:03

#88

Offline

Joined: May 2005

Posts:

Future Clan Ranking - discusion !

wrote:

pfff.... HK only played against easy clans pffff..... i think you should look at who we did play and stop making assumptions about which clan is at which level surely this is what the ranking is for...

man i did not say that, else hk never been 4th in the new rank i made. I said only drt is better and same active clan so better ranked than hk in the reality and what i propose is a ranksystem witch show reality

14. May 2006 - 10:12

#89

Offline

Joined: Aug 2004

Posts:

Future Clan Ranking - discusion !

wrote:

wrote:
pfff.... HK only played against easy clans pffff..... i think you should look at who we did play and stop making assumptions about which clan is at which level surely this is what the ranking is for...

man i did not say that, else hk never been 4th in the new rank i made. I said only drt is better and same active clan so better ranked than hk in the reality and what i propose is a ranksystem witch show reality

so drt is better - and you decide this or the stats - that is my point....

14. May 2006 - 10:20

#90

Offline

Joined: May 2005

Posts:

Future Clan Ranking - discusion !

wrote:

so drt is better - and you decide this or the stats - that is my point....

nono, i decide nothing, they just go more points cauz they owned better ranked clan than hk during 2006 that's all but see, 1 point difference is not big problem