wrote:

wrote:

Um, please refrain yourself from taking a comparison between something that is the most popular sports game on the face of this planet to a mediocre-populated quake 3 mod.. you can't make comparisons like that.

why not? previous was good? it does look u pick only comprasion that will fit yors idea, and meter of fact that footbal is bit closer than a food couse it is game, both of comprased maters having not much to do with q3... so why first one was good and second was't...

about the food i drink beer sinence atleas 10 years and im still not bored of it...

please madB. dont be hipocrit ']

the changes about u talk in foodbal dont changes sense of this game to look like more as basketbal and onone was talked why do not make such changes there couse in both discyplins they use ball ']

and here we do talk about changing e+ into baseq3 , i am not against tiny changes to help improve e+ but in mine eyes ppl want make from footbal basketbal and im against it...

I'm not being hypocritical, but you have to agree that comparing E+ to Football in terms of gaming principles and rule stability is kind of silly... first of all - why would anyone WANT to change how football looks, and how it plays in all of the important aspects? Quite possibly, no-one, it works great as it is. And the suits that make it run as a profiting business would probably heavily frown if someone came up with some drastic changes.. what if the fans would turn away from it, eh?

Now, E+, on the other hand, is run and made by people that actually play it. Theres no money here, no enterprises, businesses. That's why the comparison is completely off the track - here is no pressure to keep the things as they are, we are free to change the configs as we see fit.

And some things get boring faster than other. It's also subject to personal preferences, etc etc... no equal comparisons can be made.

------

Look, i don't want to engage into some long sermon-like argues about comparisons and other shit, it's not relevant here. My humble opinion is that some changes, which would first be tested on a server for a period of time, can't hurt anything. It can only help make the gameplay more smooth, and E+ as a whole more attractive.

How about we just see how things will develop?

wrote:

@rena - pls stop using we instead I. ty.

WE
lol, only what I can answer to you about that sentence uper. I have to explane when and why I use "WE" insted of "I" That is obvious if people dont follow whole meaning of discussion... Ehm... I use WE when I think that majority think similar about disscusion in progress or in cases when things are obvious. Take it anyhow and on anyway "WE" represent "I" but on more descriptive and focused way. If somone dont like that fraseology, please just take "WE" as "I" in your minds... or just prove it that majority dont think similar. And I will use "WE" in any case whan I think that majority think similar as "I" about disscussion in progress.... no matter somone like that or dislike... Anyway I should make disclaimer for people which think badly about me that I wanna be supreme beeing on E+ speaking "WE" in some cases whan I think is apropriate to use it, that is not true or my intention anyway. When confrontation with constructive argumens from some part have lack of arguments, then start demagogy and dont use "WE" or why use "IMO" etc. I should link this post with my signature perhaps ?
Best regards

mate and comparing it to food its not silly?

please stop

lol@hq?

rena started blabbering...

wrote:

@at MAD, what do you have against food : It is vital in every human life... Mor then that, food is art, poetry, in some cases food is better then sex when some profo cook - cheef make it... You really disapoint me... [/color]

Nothing! I like food just like everyone. I'm not anorectic (altho i'm skinny). But comparing food to a string of binary data isn't really accurate ;p