wrote:

Now i have a sugestion for an ongoing ranking. It never has to be reseted, it also encourages active play, and it even allows clans to play more active for a while, then have a break (due to vacations or else) and still come back and be on first position (or some other).

Now the thing about this ranking is that it is targeted, so we would have to agree on a timescale for it. I belive one round per 2 weeks is best, cause it allows clans to play more than one official CW per round, or for clans that cant otherwise, to at least train one sunday and play on the other.

What you are talking about here is a tournament or a league, a timescale, rounds planed, it is far from a rank system. What i'm talking about is to rank clanwars, not to encourage people to play if they don't want, can't or are inactive.

Personnaly i believe that a timescale is impossible to respect over a season/year (clan dies, clan become inctive, clan loose members, etc etc) each clan must decide himself what he wanna do and should be able to change their decision based on clan new stuff.

About reseting score each season, it's not an obligation i think, till there can be negative scores when you loose wars, it was more to make an actual view of clan skill over a year than something based on ages

Of course we can implement tourneys to this rank system, but it is something else.

When you are the 1st, that's not up to you to proove you are better... that's what a challenge means

With the point i talked about, with more than 6 points diffrence, the challenger can't get a better rank than the challengered if the challengered loose the war but it decrease only the difference

wrote:

f
meybe made it as leader must acep 3 challengers per month minimum if not he will change position with best challenging clan

i'm definitly not agree with that, a rank system isn't here to force anybody to play when they don't want. If the clan don't wanna play, then he will be overtaken by others who win wars.
Ranksystem 's just here to give an other information about this clan skill and activity in the overall community.

ok i see you didnt understand my system.

1. if you dont play you loose rank. but it hapens slowly. i mean, max you can loose over 3 months is 6 positions. and that is if you werent active the round before.

2. the system already takes into account the fact that one clan might challange everyone, if it does, in the end he will play with noone because of challange spam. system encourages playing one game for taking rank and one game for defending rank per round (altough you are required only to play one game for defending, if you like your position).

ok i might as well post the entire system now, look at my next post.

edit: loosing a position here is not so heavy a thing, you can take it back next "round". so even if you end up from position 1 to position 3 or 4 because of vacations, when you get back you will have priority to take position 1 back. if you fail, well you dont deserve it anyway, right?

it wont hapen

because they higher rank the higher priority. gimme sec to write it all down and post it, you will see what i mean

this system encourages two sides :

First be skilled .Secondly , be active.

it is good enough for me.

for skills only evaluation there are tournaments and championships.

/edit

i know swe rocks....but last time i saw a swe player was last year. so please dont come and say swe are top clan in E+.look at KOs, they challenge a lot.and they get points in reward. they are here.

look at DRT , they help pple , active in community and on forums..they play CWs.

for me those two clans are more valuable to E+ than swe and they deser ve to be ranked better.